This is the 18th of 20 posts I will be writing during the PARCC testing window of March 9 – April 10. If you’re interested in the growing master list of reasons we opted out of standardized tests in 2015, you can find it here.
Reason 18: Federal Overreach
Honestly, this has always been one of my reasons for opposing standardized tests, and is one of the points of agreement with some of my more conservative colleagues. I believe that initiatives like Race to the Top and the manner in which the Obama administration coerced states into adopting the Common Core State Standards are prime examples of the federal government exerting quasi-unconstitutional authority over states’ rights to educate their children as the people of that state see fit.
When you opt your children out of standardized tests, you’ll often receive push back from schools or districts in the form of “this is a state mandated test therefore your child must take it”. The problem with this claim is that the test is really only “state mandated” because it is also federally mandated under NCLB. In the days before NCLB the attention paid to students who did not take standardized tests paled in comparison to the scrutiny of today.
That’s because the pressure that we receive as parents for opting out of standardized tests comes directly from the White House. Well, maybe not directly, but it might as well. Schools are under pressure from their district offices to test every child, districts are under pressure from the state to test every child and states are under pressure from the federal government to test every child because NCLB mandates that at least 95% of children from each school are tested.
If states fail to meet expectations for NCLB then they have to go hat-in-hand to the Department of Education, specifically Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, who is a cabinet member in the office of the President. So, I think you can see why I feel like the pressure I receive when opting out of standardized tests comes from the White House.
The President needs this leverage in order to convince states to adopt teacher evaluation systems based partially on standardized test scores and to create new regulations for teacher education programs that, you guessed it, uses student test scores as a measure of success. All of this despite the fact that research has found that student test scores are not in any way related to other measures of good teaching.
But we can’t really expect the federal government and a Secretary of Education that isn’t actually an educator to really understand something as complicated as “good teaching”. Which is exactly why they should leave this determination to the people who know what they are talking about.